I absolutely would agree with that. There's the old saying that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, and I think it applies absolutely to these respective technologies. With carbon capture and storage, you're trying to put the genie back in the bottle after you've already let it out. It's much better to reduce our emissions wherever possible.
If carbon capture and storage or negative emissions technologies are used, it should be for the most difficult to decarbonize industries only, and for those that we cannot possibly move away from, as well as, in the case of negative emissions technologies, to actually suck the carbon dioxide that's already in the atmosphere back out and try to make the situation better than it will otherwise be.