Thank you for that.
I only received the split a few minutes ago. I hear what you're saying, and I can happily look at it.
I will also say that the intention was to have a subcommittee meeting before the end of the session. We can do that sooner rather than later.
If we want to make this an ongoing priority, I'm happy to do that and we can have a discussion in a subcommittee meeting about how we want to balance witnesses. Hey, if we want to have all 157 here, we can fill the fall calendar with them, but the government's legislation is going to get out ahead of us.
Where do we want to be with this? That's a discussion I'm happy to take to the subcommittee in the interest of moving the room availability forward for today.
Go ahead, Mr. Simard.