The officials in my department are professionals, just as the commissioner is a professional. They had a difference of opinion with respect to the boundary conditions that one uses in accounting for emissions reductions. Ours aligns with the World Resources Institute and the International Energy Agency's methodology. He had a broader definition of emissions that would be captured under the cap. There was a legitimate difference of opinion.
Evidence of meeting #3 for Natural Resources in the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was program.
A video is available from Parliament.