Thanks.
There are two main things. One is around how Canadian biomass is viewed. This is what otherwise would be wood waste from our sawmill. The tree is harvested after the plan and the consultation happen. It goes to the mill, wood is created and you get shavings, bark and sawdust. The treatment of that biomass under the clean fuel regulations is not yet recognized. That's one of our big issues and we need certainty there. There was talk at the officials level of setting up a new regime to determine if it's sustainable or not.
It's sourced from public, provincially managed forests where there are detailed consultations and science. Millions of dollars of planning goes in and there's an approval process. Our position is that if it comes from a provincially approved forest management plan, it should be recognized as sustainable.
That's the first frustration we have right now. We're continuing to work through that with officials.
The second one is around what qualifies for credit generation under the regulation. That's still to be determined, but we have some big companies that have opportunities to invest in other countries that want to see what that plan is.
Those are two big issues. They are the issue of the treatment and the recognition of the sustainability of biomass from well-managed Canadian forests, and how we can get some certainty around how the credit generation framework is going to unfold.