Pardon me, thank you. My apologies for that.
To your question, only about one in 10,000 mineral showings reaches production, so there's already an inherent impediment for a mineral explorer looking in Canada to bring a new project to market. We understand that it is a huge hill to climb for mineral exploration in Canada.
When we think of critical minerals, we understand the nature of the geology—I'm a geologist by training. These deposits are likely to be smaller, more disparate or disaggregated, and so will require, in many cases, more projects to make up that production base that was referred to earlier in terms of sourcing.
There are a few things that we need to focus on. We've talked about mineral tax credits, obviously, as one key part, but also, it's super critical to think about the amount of land that we need to reasonably access in a reasonable amount of time to conduct the work to identify those deposit. We feel that the government could make more efforts at doing some of that baseline public geoscience work that we hope can develop that public good, be the evidence for starting to make more land management decisions and be more proactive in identifying areas where mineral explorers can go.
I think some of our forestry colleagues referred earlier to integrating traditional knowledge and cultural values into making land management decisions. That is something that our industry certainly endorses, but we have to make these decisions expressly. We have to figure out where we can go and explore.