I'm going to answer in English so my colleagues can expand on what I've said, or correct me if need be.
Listen, what if we were always asking them why they don't build with wood when they do a public building, and check that first. The alternative will always be positive from a carbon perspective to build with wood first. That question is asked in some locations, but not everywhere. Can you build in wood? Why are you not building in wood? Why is this public building not built in wood first? That's the first thing.
The second is codes and standards. This sounds boring. All of the codes and standards are built thinking about steel and concrete, not wood. We need codes and standards that are performance-based. It's not how you build it, but how the performance is.
We're going towards that. We're progressing. That's the emphasis—not to pick the material, but to pick the performance.