Of course, we have been. That's my point. We have been leading the globe for decades as far as environmental impact is concerned and have been making sure that we are the least impactful in the world.
You mentioned concerns about U.S. policy, but we just heard earlier—I think it was you who said this—about the dozens of LNG projects we see in the U.S. We have cancelled so many and they are able to get them going, so I don't quite see how this U.S. regulatory regime has been causing us these major issues.
The other thing is the United States Department of Defense's initiative to invest in Canada's critical minerals seems to be a bit of a head-scratcher on the sovereignty front. If this suggestion had materialized during the previous administration, perhaps it wouldn't have been quite as well received.
Do you really believe that is positive for us, or are they the only game in town after we scare away other investors?