Thank you very much. I understand that completely.
Please enlighten me. In the type of analysis that you do, I assume that you use a grid with certain criteria. One criterion that I think is critical is the cost, the lowest bidder principle, assuredly.
As we know, the major problem with mass timber construction today is that costs are a little higher because it's not part of our culture. From a structural and engineering standpoint, you have to expect slightly higher costs.
Don't you think there should be some alignment between the lowest bidder and the one whose costs are slightly higher, but who offers much greater environmental benefits?