Thank you for the question.
I think Public Services and Procurement Canada is a leader in recapitalization projects.
I'll say this couple of words in English: the shadow price of carbon.
When the industry was calculating the price of carbon at $50 per tonne, we started calculating it at $300 per tonne for a building with a 40‑year useful life cycle. In our major projects, I think that has made a difference for wood, including mass timber, because the cost of a project is calculated over the useful life of the building. In this case, we're talking about 40 years, according to our calculations.
In my opinion, this should favour bids that offer—I won't say the lowest price—the best price, taking into account the environmental impact.