There is this term that's used, “the golden share”. An entity, a government, may own 5% of a company, effectively blocking the company from being taken over, and it's used quite effectively around the world.
In this case, say company A based in China could have a 5%, a 10% or a 3% equity stake in company B based in another country, and that company can then purchase assets abroad, but de facto, even though company A only owns a small percentage, it has much influence on company B. I think about that. To me, that scenario is there.
I want to ask a second follow-up question.
The Investment Canada Act.... There is a bill going through Parliament. How different would the analysis be today or ex ante? How different would the analysis be going forward from what is done under the existing or the old Investment Canada Act in this type of transaction?