As I listened to Mr. Angus, he was asking really important questions that were very critical of your work, but what I'm trying to figure out as a parliamentarian is whether or not we have to do more to actually provide the guidance.
Mr. Angus was talking, of course, about some of the economic concerns and about where the pulp might be going, but if that's not actually a mandate under your direction and part of what you're being directed to study, I think it's our job as parliamentarians to understand that.
On the guidelines, it doesn't seem as though there's a whole lot about.... There's a lot around supply chains in Canada in a critical minerals sense. There's a lot on national security in terms of assets. There's not a whole lot on broader economic interests, with Russia being the one example where that might have changed.
Is it a fair comment that there's not a whole lot in the security review provision that relates to external exports of Canadian materials elsewhere?