Thank you for the question. I'll try to answer that.
In terms of the proposed concept of having a much more efficient regulatory system, it's really not made on the concept of saving monies. The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission is one of the world's best regulators, and it's a quasi-judicial body. Let me repeat that. It's a quasi-judicial body that oversees every step of the nuclear industry, where we are probably one of the most highly regulated industries in the world. I would offer us as a model for any other energy sector in terms of the regulatory requirements we have, which is a good thing from a perspective of ensuring the safe operation of our plants.
What we're suggesting is that, as the government is looking at meeting climate goals, there needs to be consideration, as technologies evolve, of reducing duplications. I think my colleague here talked about some existing locations, or brownfields, where the regulations could be reduced in terms of some of the duplications. As technologies also evolve, there are different safety systems introduced, passive safety systems. The regulations need to reflect that reality. That's really what we're talking about here—an efficiency of the regulatory regime as opposed to any other—