The procedural point of order is relevant. The issue here is that they're debating for a member who never showed up to the committee, a member who never spoke, who never asked a single question, who suddenly had his feelings hurt when you didn't recognize him. That's the question.
The question is not on the “just transition”. The question isn't on eating brussels sprouts. The question is not on children.
I would ask you to keep the issue relevant.
Are we hearing that the poor member who can't even—