Thank you, Chair.
There are actually three matters of order that I have been trying to raise.
The first is that during points of order, members are entitled to make arguments about matters of order. Arguments about matters of order are not points of debate. It happened during Mr. Falk's intervention that you and others suggested he was venturing into debate when he was, in fact, making substantive arguments in relation to the rules and matters of order.
Engaging in debate is when you use points of order to make points about the topic that don't have anything to do with the rules, something like what Mr. Angus just did when he was speaking about the legislation and his views on the legislation.