Chair, on this point order, I'd like you to clarify how points of order work.
Traditionally, in past practices of the committees that I have been part of, when one member raises a point of order, they're able to make that point of order without being interrupted in the middle of a point of order by another point of order.
If you allow members to interrupt in the middle of each other's points of order with points of order, I fear that we will end up in a kind of infinite regress of points of order on points of order, which will prevent anyone from actually being able to articulate what their point of order is.