I believe the issue is that it's disrespectful to the interpreters. From my perspective, I think we can all agree that we shouldn't be speaking over each other. I don't think we need to go far down that road.
Mr. Angus has had the floor now for, I believe, almost three weeks. We've been trying to get through his argument on a subamendment. He was going through that, and I would really like the opportunity to hear from Mr. Angus and finally give him the floor. If no one is challenging the chair on the fact that Mr. Angus actually does have the floor 16 hours in, I believe it's time that we went back to Mr. Angus and allowed him to complete his argument.