I'd like the chair to be aware that at least the last two—I've lost track, quite frankly—points of order by MP Sorbara were not points of order. They were debate. Quite frankly, if he wishes to engage in this type of intervention, which is clearly what it is...it's meant to stall the ability of my colleague Mr. Genuis to actually get to the point. He's raising issues of relevancy.
That's not a point of order, Chair, and you know it. As a suggestion to Mr. Sorbara, he should listen to the actual statements made by Mr. Genuis before he raises another point of order. With the last two, he was literally interrupted midstream before he actually got to his point.
I hear what he's saying. He wants to move this forward, but his own actions defy that logic.