Thank you for clarifying that minor point regarding the interpreters, since I rely entirely on them to follow the debate.
I've listened to the 118th version of Mr. Genuis' point of order, which still amounts to the same thing. Couldn't we resolve the impasse in which we find ourselves by simply requesting a committee vote to make this clear?
The committee could rule that Mr. Angus now has the floor. If I refer to the standing order that my colleague read earlier, it concerned cases in which the committee has adopted something.
Can we vote on the fact that Mr. Angus currently has the floor on the amendment that was introduced. That way, it will be clear and we can move on to something else.
Can the committee vote on that? It will be final and clear for everyone.