I invite Mr. Dreeshen, Mr. Falk and all my colleagues to listen to this.
It probably won't happen, but if one day 10 francophone MPs start talking at the same time, Mr. Dreeshen won't hear anything because the interpreters won't be able to translate the remarks of 10 individuals simultaneously.
What Mr. Dreeshen wants is to waste our time. I know it. I agree, but he could do so in a much more interesting way than he's doing it now by asking you a question that I consider absurd. I don't know that his question is absurd—I don't want to make him angry—but it seems absurd to me. He's asking if this undermines the interpreters' safety. It's quite simple: if 10 of you speak at the same time, you aren't using the interpretation, unless I'm the one speaking. I'm the only person speaking French here. The interpreters can't do their work if you talk at the same time. Every time 10 of you speak simultaneously, they tell me that interpretation is impossible.
The point of order that was raised concerned only that. You can ask the chair to apologize for mistakes that you feel he has made or for any harm that might have caused, but the Conservative Party doesn't understand the basic principle regarding interpretation: the committee has to be accessible to everyone, and everyone must have access to what is said in committee.
The main problem is that I can't understand anything when everyone speaks into a microphone at once. It's as simple as that.