Thanks, Mr. Chair.
Related to your procedural comments earlier about respecting each other and not alleging, allying and falsehoods—Ms. Dabrusin emphasized that and so have you—then I won't belabour it at this point. But as my colleague, Mr. Patzer, just articulated, the issues we raised previously, and that I did just immediately, so that your direction could be delivered here about not alleging, falsehoods, or lying, how is it...?
I just gave three instances, which are not matters of opinion but they're in fact publicly verifiable, just to prove to colleagues that I'm not just making this up as I go along. There were three specific and very concise examples that are publicly verifiable facts. They're not matters of opinion or subjectivity. I endeavoured to do that, not to get into the substance of the debate. You're surely right that there will be lots of opportunity for that, and we'll certainly exercise that time and that ability and responsibility we have as members of Parliament as well as the official opposition. If we are to help you deliver successfully on your ruling about not alleging, allying, then how would you like that to be done?
I just thought that the really short three examples of publicly verifiable facts would be a way to show that, since we also do seem to face untrue allegations of partisanship and so-called monkey business.... That's just why I had endeavoured to give those short points.