Okay. Yes. Thanks, Mr. Chair.
Just to be clear, I was actually not debating. I was clearly just making an observation, which I believe the chair should consider. It's not a point of debate, but just my observation of my recollection of that meeting.
My point of order is this. Mr. Genuis got cut off when he was expanding on his point of order. What I have noticed is that whenever Mr. Genuis is making his point of order, he frequently is interrupted with other points of order for which you immediately stop his point of order and defer to the other points of order. But in the case of when Mr. Angus or Mr. Kelloway were making points of order, there were points of order interrupting their points of order which you did not accept and you allowed them to continue to make their points of order.
My suggestion would be, if you want to maintain a little better decorum here, that you not allow some members, some parties, to be able to interrupt points of order and others not, and—