We will go to a challenge of the chair's ruling.
(Ruling of the chair sustained: yeas 7; nays 4)
Shall amendment NDP-1 carry?
(Amendment agreed to: yeas 7; nays 4 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Shall amendment BQ-2 carry?
(Amendment negatived: nays 10; yeas 1 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Shall amendment LIB-1 carry?
(Amendment agreed to: yeas 7; nays 4 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
If CPC-2 is adopted, CPC-3 cannot be moved or voted on because of a line conflict.
Shall amendment CPC-2 carry?
(Amendment negatived: nays 7; yeas 4 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Shall amendment CPC-3 carry?
(Amendment negatived: nays 7; yeas 4 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
Now we'll go to NDP-2. If NDP-2 is adopted, BQ-3 becomes moot and cannot be moved or voted on.
Shall NDP-2 carry?
(Amendment agreed to: yeas 7; nays 4 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
(Clause 2 as amended agreed to: yeas 7; nays 4)
We are now at the preamble.
If LIB-12 is adopted, CPC-74 cannot be moved due to a line conflict.
Shall amendment LIB-12 carry?
(Amendment agreed to: yeas 6; nays 5 [See Minutes of Proceedings])
We are now at CPC-75, which is inadmissible. The amendment seeks to make a substantive modification by adding new elements to the preamble. Since no amendment has been adopted to warrant the addition of these new elements, I declare the amendment inadmissible.