I think “technology, not taxes” is a tag line; it's not a strategy. It's not a well-thought-out way of thinking about this.
Technology requires that you think about how you develop technology, demonstrate technology and ultimately commercially deploy technology, including incentives to deploy early stage technologies going forward. It requires thought. You are not simply deploying CCUS because it's a revenue generator. You're deploying it because you're trying to save the planet.
Mr. Poilievre trying to use “technology, not taxes” as a strategy somehow is a bit laughable. This is a guy who was elected out of university. He's never worked on technology. He's never worked in business. He has sat in a green chair for 20 years and is now entitled to whatever pension he's going to be entitled to, but he has zero background in the relevant parts of this business.