Yes, and it remains part of it in this bill. So I'm hard pressed to see how this bill can be seen as a step toward the energy transition. As far as I'm concerned, there's no energy transition in this bill.
I think wind is being used to doa bit of greenwashing. I don't want to use the word “hypocritical”, but let's say I find it a bit rich to want to remove the word “petroleum” from the bill, because it specifically applies to oil and gas projects when it comes to energy. I find that unfortunate. I feel it's greenwashing, in a way.
Do you agree with me?