Mr. Chair, Ms. Jones wanted to yield the rest of her time to me because we appreciate each other.
Mr. Guilbeault, I'm glad to see you here. I'm going to ask you a similar question to the one I put to your colleagues.
Personally, I don't think Bill C-49 is about the energy transition. As far as I'm concerned, the energy transition is about switching from high carbon-intensive energies to low carbon-intensive energies.
To explain to you what I see in Bill C-49, I'm going to paraphrase what Normand Mousseau said when he testified before us. I'm sure you know him. Ultimately, Bill C-49 would put renewable energy sources and fossil fuel sources on the same footing. Nothing in this bill suggests that we're looking for a fossil fuel reduction plan. Instead we're seeking to develop wind, which is a good thing, despite all the stumbling blocks that entails. The experts we've spoken to, such as Mr. Mousseau, have told us that many elements weren't taken into consideration.
I don't believe that Bill C-49 is genuinely about the energy transition. Apart from the superficial amendment to change the name of the Offshore Petroleum Board to the Energy Regulator, I see no genuine willingness on the government's part to get out of fossil fuels.
I don't know whether you agree with me on that.