I'm going to add to what you just said.
From an energy standpoint, Canada is unfortunately a prisoner of its own fossil fuel resources. I say that because you said your government had eliminated fossil fuel subsidies. However, that's not true; you've eliminated the subsidies you considered inefficient. I even perceive a definition problem here since I still don't understand what you mean by inefficient subsidies.
In addition, your government constantly exploits a new hobgoblin, reducing the carbon intensity of oil. We're talking here about reducing the carbon intensity of oil using carbon capture strategies. So we're going to invest billions of dollars in projects that are technically very hard to carry out. When I was in Berlin with Mr. Wilkinson, we visited the Siemens corporation, and its officers told us it was so technically risky to produce hydrogen based on a carbon capture strategy that the company would never do it. And yet your government is headed in that direction.
Furthermore, what really bothers me is that your government is making clean energy compete with fossil energy. That's also what Normand Mousseau told us.
My impression when I look at the budget is that fossil fuels are getting the lion's share. You invested more than $30 billion in a pipeline. When I look at this bill, what I see is a kind of greenwashing. I know what it costs to build the infrastructure to distribute clean electricity. Quebec is really good at that. In my region, Rio Tinto is able to do it to produce clean hydroelectricity. However, if you put dirty fossil fuels in competition with clean energy sources, I don't see how we can develop that industry.