No, what I'm a believer in is the opportunity to have clear conversations, discussion and study into the pros and cons of everything and what the total impact will be.
I certainly take the point of the question, and I understand the logic behind it, but I wouldn't be able to just wholeheartedly say yes to that without knowing what these different impacts are. Again, that's something we would work with our regulator on. Certainly there are a lot of smart people within our various departments who would want to see what the study is.
While I certainly get it, I wouldn't be able to automatically say that yes, I think that clean energy has priority over it without knowing the full impact, especially on the future of Newfoundlanders and Labradorians and keeping everything in consideration.