I have a point of order, Mr. Chair. I just want to get some clarification either from you, Mr. Chair, or from our legislative clerks.
I noticed that last time we tried getting unanimous consent to lump some clauses, it was given a no. It is the ability of members not to agree to that. I wonder if there might be wording that.... Instead of an all-or-nothing clause, I wonder if we might see if there are any clauses that members would like to vote on separately from that grouping. I noticed that there were some that all voted in favour of or that people didn't want to speak to. Therefore, instead of having just all-or-nothing lumping together, I wonder if we could call perhaps that clauses 20 to 27 be lumped, unless anybody wants to pull out a specific clause to vote on separately.
I'm not sure if that can be done procedurally, but some lumping, some grouping, could be a way of helping us move forward, if that is allowed.