Thank you.
Having listened to the commentary for the last few minutes, I think there's a distinction to be made. We have construction-type jobs, which is basically what we're talking about. We need that sort of expectation and expertise. Then, on the other side, we have maintenance, but there's also the operational part. I think that's the difference when we talk about how we're going to bring in people who are used to working in the oil sands and oil and gas and how they're going to jump into these types of jobs.
These jobs are gone once the construction is done. It isn't as though this is a long-term employment plan. The companies are going to use what they can to get these things built as quickly as they can and get them out, and they're getting their money from the government on this. Those are the realities that exist. Even though they're going to have jobs, if the plan works to break up the oil and gas industry so that it can't be workable anymore, those are not the kinds of jobs those folks are used to. They're working day-to-day tough jobs. That's what you do in oil and gas. It's not that once the windmill is up there, they'll just watch it spin.
I think it's important to recognize that this is not going to be the panacea for job creation that some people suggest it might be.