This is the part I spoke about earlier when I asked the officials about the significance of “the Minister of the Environment has issued a decision statement under section 65 of that Act”. I was questioning whether or not that happens to be one of the sections that have been deemed unconstitutional. If it has, I guess we're living in hopes that there will be a remedy, but I just want to know whether for section 65 of the act, there is hope that later it will not be unconstitutional.
We're also dealing with section 137 of the act. I think that's it. No, there's also a reference back through to it.
Could you just give me some clarity as to whether this is one of the sections that have been deemed unconstitutional? Again, my hope is that we're not going to be putting these ministers or any future ministers in jeopardy, in that we don't really know what the results are going to be.
I might ask one other pointed question on this as well. There has been a big discussion about the direction and when it will come into force. If we survive around here until 2025, maybe there's a chance it will have come into force by then. If that is not the case, if it's a little sooner, what are your thoughts on all of these remedies taking place such that this legislation is going to be properly addressed from a legal standpoint?