Well, I certainly don't speak for Smart Prosperity on their grant as a co-investigator, but certainly, if you want their overall position, I'd encourage you to bring in some of their leadership team to speak.
On a more general question, I think the starting point for any economist is to make sure the costs of production, all of them, are internals of those—and consumption as well—in making the decisions, so that when you decide to produce oil and gas, the emissions, the tailings and the environmental damage associated with that production are not passed on to someone else without you having to pay that freight, and that, as a consumer, those costs are reflected in the prices you pay.
Whether it's carbon pricing or whether it's the acid rain program types of policies that Mr. Angus talked about earlier, I believe, and that had a big impact in your region as well, I believe, those are all examples of things where we've put the cost of environmental damage into the business decision, and that, to me, is always the gateway to that type of linking environmental performance with economic prosperity.