Evidence of meeting #91 for Natural Resources in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was amendment.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Lauren Knowles  Deputy Director, Department of Natural Resources
Jean-Nicolas Bustros  Counsel, Department of Justice
Cheryl McNeil  Deputy Director, Department of Natural Resources
Jean-François Roman  Legal Counsel, Department of Justice

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal George Chahal

Thank you.

I'm going to you next, Ms. Dabrusin. You can clarify everything that was said, so our colleagues clearly know what your intent was and what's going on.

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

What you have is “new G-25”, which I had numbered as G-25.1. It's the same. The difference is that when we put in the new one, I had a different numbering in mind.

The wording you have is the one that I want to move. It's just called “new G-25” in your package and it's G-25.1 in mine.

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

Jeremy Patzer Conservative Cypress Hills—Grasslands, SK

Why don't we kick off the next meeting with this amendment she's seeking? That would be a great way to start our next meeting, Mr. Chair.

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dabrusin Liberal Toronto—Danforth, ON

Can we get consent before we get to that?

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

Jeremy Patzer Conservative Cypress Hills—Grasslands, SK

Yes.

We consent to her moving the amendment at the start of the next meeting.

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal George Chahal

Ms. Dabrusin, as we start the next meeting, you will be able to present your new amendment, which is new G-25.

Colleagues, I think we're saying that this is a point to end today's meeting. Thank you so much for your hard work today and for being collaborative, working together and getting a lot accomplished.

We'll see you on Thursday.

The meeting is adjourned.