What I said earlier stands. This was an amendment that was put in writing, which is here.
I believe, from what Ms. Dabrusin said, that there was a miscommunication with the numbering of this. The amendment is the same. Her numbering and the numbering that was presented were different. She misinterpreted.
I don't want to speak on Ms. Dabrusin's behalf, but I hope that clarifies what her intent was. She wants to move the amendment that was provided. It's not a new amendment. It's not a subamendment. It's the same amendment. She just had an error that she overlooked on the numbering of it. That's what it was. It was a technical issue on her end.
Once again, I'm sorry, Ms. Dabrusin. I think that's what your intent was, and I hope that clarifies things.
Go ahead, Mr. Patzer.