Thanks for the question.
The program, as you say, was very successful. It actually expended its funds more quickly than we had anticipated, and in that regard it incented people to actually make energy efficiency retrofits, which were obviously very positive in terms of the fight against climate change, but the program, by and large, was being used by people who were in the upper middle and upper income brackets. It actually was only $5,000, which meant that people who actually needed the money were probably the ones who most probably couldn't afford the remainder of the money that would be required. It required them to put the money up, and then they were paid back over time.
Again, that made it difficult for people who live on more modest means to access it. We decided to focus on a new program that would really be focused on people who live on more modest incomes. It would have larger grants that would be paid up front and that would probably be delivered through provincial agencies. We would use the other program, which is the zero-interest loan program, to provide a financial benefit for people who could actually afford to pay the loan back over time out of the energy savings.