Perhaps I can respond briefly specifically on the issue of genetic discrimination.
While I don't want to downplay the advances made in other countries, I should emphasize that Canada has played a leadership role in this and should continue to play a leadership role. Probably many of the lessons came from Huntington's disease, where all kinds of issues were opened up by having this genetic information and the potential for discrimination. We should definitely take a page from that book.
What this does is it opens up complex ethical issues, and Canada also has a leadership role in neuroethics. We want to promote that. We want neuroethics to be a part of every collaborative team that unfolds, because what we're seeing, actually, is that other countries haven't thought through these questions as well as they should have. If you can mail off a saliva sample to get a DNA analysis, and nobody actually knows how to handle the results, we have a problem, both scientifically and ethically.
So we should be the leaders, not the followers.