I'll just finish my train of thought on that one.
My question--because we're seeing people go into debt--is if it would not be better to have a national strategy where everybody gets the same level of service or treatment according to their individual needs, as opposed to saying, “This is the service we're providing and that's all that is available for two years.” What do you do after those two years? What do you do after they grow up? How do we actually best support them?
I have another question, and I'll leave it with answers for all of you. It's with respect to the surveillance, and it's a question that I actually brought up at the last meeting. Is the surveillance being done with respect to how many children are ending up in Children's Aid? How many of them who have autism are abused? How many families are finding themselves in the mental health field because they can't cope with the stress?
I'm going to leave it at that. I know Mr. Lendrum wanted to speak with respect to the cost and the availability of service, and what happens when they don't get IBI, and then maybe--