I would just underscore points that I tried to make and that Dr. Mottron has made as well. I believe it's very important that we think about neurological conditions of children very broadly, of which autism is an important group but by no means the only group. That's number one.
Number two is that we think about function and development and family well-being, and not about specific treatments, because by and large we do not have specific treatments. The notion that IBI for autism or botulinum toxin for cerebral palsy is the treatment is I think misguided and distracting.