What Dr. Rosenbaum said was interesting. You said that a good application, well written, will likely be funded. That's not what we've heard from the other neurological disorder groups.
That's certainly encouraging, but I wonder if it's because we're not looking for research enough; the criteria are not appropriate enough. One thing we heard again and again was that about 20% of applications got funded, but 80% didn't. They said it wasn't because they weren't good applications. They said there were excellent applications for excellent research projects that weren't being funded. That was told to us by all the other neurological groups.
What do you think makes autism research different?