Mr. Chair, I have four questions to ask. I would be willing to obtain the answers in writing.
First, there was a problem regarding the recognition of credentials for Francophone immigrants. In fact, professional bodies often conduct their business in English. Can you tell me whether any progress has been made in this respect? If not, what will be done to persuade and, if need be, force professional bodies to recognize the credentials of Francophone professionals?
My second question regards the language training of refugees, primarily. It appears that outside Quebec, except for perhaps one place in Ottawa, not much is happening in French.
Is this still the case? As well, what is the reason for the reluctance to provide immigrants and refugees who are neither Anglophone nor Francophone with training in both official languages? Frankly, Canada could perhaps be encouraging bilingualism, not unilingualism.
Third, the Official Languages Action Plan launched by the previous government in 2003 contained a $9 million commitment for immigration. It appears that this amount will have to be increased to implement the action plan.
Mr. Arnal, in your opinion, how much money would be needed to renew the action plan from 2008 through to 2013?
Lastly, the current government seems to be heading towards a proactive immigration policy, that is to say it will choose refugees or, at least, focus on something different from what we have at present.
Mr. Jean, what discussions were held and what decisions were made, if any, with regard to the strategy of choosing refugees? If this is the government's strategy, will it be looking for Francophone refugees? Up until now, my understanding is that all the refugees selected by the government were not Francophones.