Mr. Chair, I'd like to give you a piece of information. The act requires that Air Canada comply with Part IV. If this bill went ahead, it would require Jazz to comply with Part IV.
You must be aware of the fact that that part contains section 25 of the act, which states that, every time a federal institution—Air Canada or the affiliates covered—retains the services of a contractor or a third party that renders services for it, it has an obligation, whether that third party is subject to the act or not, to ensure that the service provided on its behalf is provided in both official languages. Each time, Air Canada or the federal institution, under the Official Languages Act, would therefore have an obligation to ensure that the service is provided in both official languages.
I simply want to emphasize for the committee that section 25 can indirectly make connections that it is impossible to make because of the constitutional limits I explained...