Thank you for the question.
I think that the action plan should focus more on communities at the local level, as Mr. Bélanger said earlier. Of course, we have made progress in the area of education. There has been some progress in Ontario, but it did not necessarily happen at the community level.
We mentioned that the ACFO will close its doors and that many people are doing a lot of volunteer work. None of that has changed, on the contrary. The Dion plan is not responsible for this state of affairs. Rather, it is due to the standpattism within government, whereby officials and the people in charge of developing projects try to play the security card, if you will. That is where the problem lies.
In my opinion, the Dion plan contained marvellous initiatives in the area of health care and in other sectors. There have been certain results, but they are limited to major infrastructure projects.
There's also the issue relating to the relevance of local organizations, which Mr. Lemieux alluded to earlier. There's no doubt that these organizations are relevant. If it hadn't been for the ACFO, the Collège Boréal in Sudbury would not exist anymore. However, today, the college is filled with students.
It is obvious, that community organizations lead to these results, with a bit of help from the federal government. And of course, we want that to continue.