Yes, inasmuch as it is done in a spirit of innovation. We must stay within a framework and we must always observe many criteria and performance indicators, especially from Heritage Canada. One of the performance indicators should encourage the institutions that are innovative. We have been innovative in Saskatchewan, and this should be mentioned. As the Franco-Saskatchewanian community director just said, the things we do here are not necessarily applicable elsewhere. We do things differently; we have been innovating in the sectors of immigration and early childhood, among others, and this must be taken into account.
I take this opportunity to add a comment about the French language. On the ground, especially at Regina University, which is mainly anglophone and has not had much of a tradition for welcoming francophones, French is not considered as a national or Canadian language.
We must convince our partners—because they are our partners and they are open-minded—that French is not Spanish or German; true, it is an international language, but it is first and foremost a Canadian language, a national language.
This is why, we ask our personnel, that must work in a very structured environment, to be highly committed to this Canadian language, this national language. We have a long way to go, and the match is not over. But I am very optimistic and positive, as you are. I think that it will work, inasmuch as we get support and there is a very clear understanding of what this means concretely to a person from the east or from Ottawa.