It's not that the motion is not substantive, it is that the "Fund" does not exist. The motion nevertheless exists. I can't understand how a lawyer could say such things. That makes fun of people.
Vivian Barbot Bloc Papineau, QC
It's not that the motion is not substantive, it is that the "Fund" does not exist. The motion nevertheless exists. I can't understand how a lawyer could say such things. That makes fun of people.
See context to find out what was said next.