Evidence of meeting #52 for Official Languages in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was commissioner.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Ms. Danielle Bélisle
Jean-Rodrigue Paré  Committee Researcher

10:20 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Guy Lauzon

Thank you very much.

Mr. Chong.

10:20 a.m.

Conservative

Michael Chong Conservative Wellington—Halton Hills, ON

I have a question for you, Mr. Chair, if anybody can answer it.

These are allegations. Are these allegations supported through a tape recording or some sort of recording? In other words, do we have proof that he has—

10:20 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Guy Lauzon

It's apparently testimony, according to the researcher.

May 1st, 2007 / 10:20 a.m.

Committee Researcher

Jean-Rodrigue Paré

It's testimony from the officials affidavits.

10:20 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Guy Lauzon

It's affidavits from the referees.

10:20 a.m.

Conservative

Michael Chong Conservative Wellington—Halton Hills, ON

But there's no tape, is there? I just wanted to clarify that.

Thank you.

10:20 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Guy Lauzon

Mrs. Boucher.

10:20 a.m.

Conservative

Sylvie Boucher Conservative Beauport—Limoilou, QC

I feel I have to say something here. As francophones, we want to know why they chose Mr. Doan. We know there are some very serious allegations against him, but this is first and foremost a question of perception. It is often said that in business and in politics, perception is very important. What we have here is a perception of a lack of respect for the francophone community.

I agree with the motion, and I would call for the vote.

10:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Guy Lauzon

Mr. Godin.

10:25 a.m.

NDP

Yvon Godin NDP Acadie—Bathurst, NB

I want to talk about perception and probability. Let us say that there are allegations about someone who works in a bank. That person is taken to court because he or she may have robbed the bank. The bank management, for its part, decides to remove the bank manager from his position at the same time. Normally, the person is sidelined until a decision is made. But that is not what was done in this case.

10:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Guy Lauzon

Thank you. I think all members have had an opportunity to express their views and discuss the issue. I will call the vote.

(The motion was carried.)

10:25 a.m.

An hon. member

It is unanimous.

10:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Guy Lauzon

We have plenty of time to discuss the committee's future business.

Mr. Nadeau.

10:25 a.m.

Bloc

Richard Nadeau Bloc Gatineau, QC

I will speak once you have finished, Mr. Chairman.

10:25 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Guy Lauzon

We will take a two-minute break before we continue our business in camera.

[The meeting continued in camera.]