Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I recommend we pass the motion. The case before the court and the questions we are raising here in Parliament are two different things. The representatives of Hockey Canada must appear before us to explain their decision. Such an appointment is a real affront. Giving either side the benefit of the doubt just won't do.
I recall that, during the sponsorship scandal, the Conservatives said that we had to send for everyone involved and question them, regardless of court cases and the work of the commission. And we did so. As parliamentarians, we have to assume our responsibilities. We have every right to send for those people.
If we do not ask representatives of Hockey Canada to appear because the case is before the court, that may suggest that whenever something unclear happens and a person is summoned before the court, appointments can be made without us being able to consider them for two or three years. That is not right. That is why I support the motion.