I'd like to suggest that what we need to do in Canada is pull the lens back and look at the problems we're causing by constant recourse to litigation. As I said, it's been recognized by some of our leading philosophers and theorists that litigation is not the way to form a culture over time. It produces a culture of winners and losers.
Now, I appreciate that in the minority language rights situation, your focus might be a little different from the thrust of my comments, which are directed more to situations where there are valid positions on both sides by citizens' groups.
Appreciate that, for example, again, to take one of the carrier issues of the day, same-sex marriage, the debates there were between legitimately holdable views between minority groups in many cases--Hindus, Sikhs, various kinds of religious groups who are also minorities that had what you could call a traditional viewpoint--and other groups that were maybe also minorities.
So it's not always the case that the program is set up to properly encourage dialogue, and I think we need to look at a way to really approach dialogue on key issues in Canada. It's essential that we do that.