That is what I was going to say. It seems to me that the CRTC option is much more difficult to achieve. Rather, the committee could indicate clearly to the government that it wants 5.4 per cent of the funds to be set aside. That would be simpler for us. In addition, that recommendation is justifiable, given that there is a precedent.
This committee should take another look at this option and ensure that it is clearly 5.4 per cent that we're dealing with and not the diluted percentage that we're speaking about here.