Mr. Petit raised an issue that has been with us for ages now, namely that information and editorials are always biased, that Radio-Canada is never on the right side, and that you're never in people's good books. It would seem that Mr. Petit has one perception and I have quite another. There are many different perceptions out there. You have to choose your editorial themes, and you convey messages in what you carry. There is no denying that. When you have a message, that message is not universal.
What criteria and parameters do you base you editorial choices on?