Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Earlier, I used the term "honesty". I said that Mr. Lemieux should show some honesty. I apologize, it was not the word I wanted to use. At no time did I presume Mr. Lemieux to be dishonest. I meant to say that he should be consistent since we cannot invite witnesses from a given list and then refrain from inviting the witnesses from that list based on the pretext that the list has not been adopted. It is in keeping with the principle mentioned earlier.
The subcommittee is comprised of members from different parties. We have all, including the chair, debated, discussed, and made decisions based on good will and the presumption that members of the committee of the whole would be in agreement. The subcommittee has carried out the task it was asked to do, and has done a good job.
That being said, can we move on to the next point, Mr. Chairman.