I understand that the example you just gave is problematic. We cannot avoid francophone communities being represented by their institutions.
The opposite problem was raised. Organizations funded by Canadian Heritage have a budget and have become representative organizations. However, that causes a major problem. All of a sudden, the community defines itself by the budgets of officials from Canadian Heritage. We academics are not funded by Canadian Heritage. We do not participate in community discussions.
However, as soon as the organizations decided to include health, they got funding. That is problematic for all communities currently. People say we need to come up with governance mechanisms that are not just based on functionality, but that reflect community reality. When a community plan is established, funded organizations are invited to the table. Since fishers are not funded, they are not there.